The Benoit case is important because it judicially acknowledges an obligation to set aside monies for Medicare future expenses in a non-Workers’ Compensation case.
The Forkey decision reaches the opposite result from Bradley in terms of the priority of competing claims between a death beneficiary and Medicare.
Where does "consider Medicare's futuer interest" come from and what does it mean? Read on if you want to know . . . .
NJ WC Chief Judge's memo highlights problematic language being requested by defendants regarding Medicare condtional payments.
PA court holds MSPA does not require Medicare on the check.
US v. Stricker is not done despite the dismissal issued previously. Read on . . .
How do you deal with a liability Medicare set aside allocation that exceeds the client’s net settlement proceeds? One approach would be to use an Ahlborn type of formula to reduce the set aside...
House Rep. Pete Stark asks GAO to investigate MSP related issues.
In U.S. v. Stricker, the government’s claims against personal injury attorneys, corporations and insurers which settled a mass tort suit without resolving Medicare conditional payments were held to...
In Bradley v. Sebelius, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals approved a probate court’s equitable distribution findings to reduce a Medicare conditional payment obligation.